A structured way to understand why competitors win — without drowning in data.
You know you need to analyze competitors. But every time you try, you end up with:
The problem isn't that you lack tools. The problem is you lack a framework — a clear way to think about what actually matters.
Without structure, competitive analysis becomes an endless research project that never leads to action.
Most competitive analysis frameworks fall into one of these traps:
SWOT analysis, Porter's Five Forces. Useful for MBA case studies, not for deciding what to ship next week.
"Export data from Tool A, cross-reference with Tool B, visualize in Tool C." You spend more time managing tools than thinking.
"Look at their website, check their pricing, read their blog." You see what they do, but not why it works.
100-page reports with every possible metric. By the time you finish reading, the market has moved on.
What you need is a framework that's simple enough to remember, but structured enough to reveal what matters.
Most teams make these errors when analyzing competitors:
You list what competitors have. But you don't ask: "What problem does this solve for their customers?"
You analyze 10 competitors across 50 dimensions. You end up paralyzed by choice instead of focused on action.
You study what competitors do, but not what customers are searching for. You miss the demand they're capturing.
You do a big analysis once, then never revisit it. Competitors evolve. Your analysis becomes stale.
Good competitive analysis answers four questions, in this order:
Which search terms, customer questions, and market segments are they owning that you're missing?
This tells you where the opportunity is.
Who do they say they're for? What problem do they emphasize? How do they differentiate?
This tells you why their messaging resonates.
Which pages, topics, and buyer journey stages are they addressing that you're not?
This tells you what gaps to fill.
Page speed, mobile experience, content structure, CTAs. Are they executing better than you?
This tells you where quick wins are.
This framework works because it's hierarchical. Demand comes first — if you're not capturing the right demand, positioning won't save you. Coverage comes before execution — having the right pages matters more than perfect page speed.
Most teams start at execution (the easiest to measure) and never get to demand (the most important).
When you apply this framework, you get:
This isn't about having all the answers. It's about asking the right questions in the right order.
There are two ways to apply this framework:
Use multiple tools to gather data for each dimension. Synthesize findings yourself. Create your own prioritization. Takes days. Requires experience to know what to look for.
Realistic for experienced growth teams or agencies.
Compare your site with a competitor's and get structured insights across all four dimensions — demand, positioning, coverage, execution — with clear prioritization. Takes minutes.
Built for founders and product teams who need structure, not raw data.
Both work. The question is whether you want to build the framework yourself or use one that's already structured.
See how this framework helps validate your go-to-market strategy and prioritize growth initiatives.
Learn MoreDiscover how to compete with bigger players by focusing on the right competitive dimensions.
Learn MoreGet a shared framework to align your team on competitive priorities and justify roadmap decisions.
Learn MoreDeliver structured competitive analysis to clients using a proven framework, not ad-hoc research.
Learn More